Was Gann Always Right?

Do you really think that William Delbert Gann was able to make perfect forecasts? If so, you better read this article...

We live in a world where it is very easy to make people believe what we want to. It happened also speaking about William Delbert Gann. I have studied his work, and I still do, he was great, a trader aware of what the Market is, but he was not always right, and it means that if we study him, we are not looking for a perfect system, but just a way to make profits.
Unfortunately, a myth about Gann has been raised, and it has been very dangerous for most of the traders that started studying him. Usually, we misunderstood the fact that he was a great trader, but not perfect at doing forecasts. I don’t want to do a biography about Gann, you can already find everything about him on the internet or in books, but what I show here is what people usually don’t say, and these are just facts (like in trading, people miss to look at the facts!).

How many real documents do we have about his forecasts?

It is important to reply to this question because, in my experience, I have learned that it is better to believe only in what we see. You know, we have many people saying wonderful things about Gann! For example, everyone knows that in 1908 he opened two Accounts, in one he put $ 300, and in 3 months he made $ 25.000. In the other one, he put $130, with a profit of 12.000 USD in 30 days. Any real document about this unbelievable performance? He provided a “famous” Supply and Demand Letter for about 40 years, so, why do we have documents about his forecast for only a few years, like the 1929 and the 1922, but no documents about his forecasts during the other years? Let me understand: we know exactly how much money he made in 30 days on his personal account in 1908, but we don’t know almost anything about his forecasts provided for 40 years!?!

OOOOOOK! Do you know the Modigliani Fake Heads Story? A very funny Italian story, a true story!

His very famous interview at The Ticker and Investment Digest, December 1909, made him become a myth (the myth itself says so; we wonder why he is not so famous among normal people). Reading this article, it looks like Gann was almost perfect at doing forecasts. The article says that he made a lot of money and so on… but still, no one tangible proof of all these wonderful words. With a bit of Money, I think I can make a journal to say the same about you. Plus, unfortunately, Gann does a forecast in the newspaper, he says that the Stock Market should push lower till March or April 1910, but the Stock Market will go on pushing lower till the end of July! Not so perfect…
The Journal of Commerce and The Evening Telegram, again, speak about his incredible skills doing forecasts, but always speaking about the past! Why is it so hard to find these forecasts when they were published, “12 months in advance”, as the Journal of Commerce says?

 

A real forecast made in advance with no doubt…

However, the most reliable forecast comes from the book “45 years in Wall Street” written in 1949. Gann gave his view about 1950-1953, and this is a real document, because we have the certainty of the date the book was published, so we can test his forecast without any doubt.
He speaks about 1950 in detail, here is what he did forecast (the book I have is in Italian, I have translated it from Italian to English):

  • Between 3 and 7 January Stocks should do a Low and then up and the trend should go on till February
  • High between 18 and 22 of March, descent till the 30-31 of March, then up again
  • April should be positive, the High of the year will be done between the 25th and the 30th of April
  • 14-21 June or 24-30 June, extreme Low and then up
  • In July the Stocks should go on pushing higher even if in a situation of a Bear Market
  • Highs between 7-10 and 18-30 July High and then down
  • August negative or flat
  • September is an important month, change in trend around the 23 and the 3rd of October, possible Low and then up
  • Time intervals indicate a descent between 14 and 21 November and then up
  • If the rally starts in November, it should work till the 15-20 December High, and then down
Gann-forecast-wrong-1950

Let’s be honest: there is not so much perfection in this forecast! And in 1949 I think he was better than in 1909! 40 years more of experience!

Let’s see the forecast for 1951-1953, maybe it gets better.
William Delbert Gann wrote: During 1951 and 1952 the economic system will go through a big depression and the Stock Market will see a Bear Trend. Many Stocks will fall down to unthinkable levels.
In November 1952 there are good probabilities that a Republican President will be elected and during October and November, the Bear Market will finish… Interval times suggest that the economy will not start growing till April or June, but during Summer and Autumn Stocks will go on to move higher and the economic system will give very positive signals.

Here is the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1951 to 1953:

WD-Gann-forecast-1951-1952-wrong-call

The forecast is wrong (except for the US President election)! No one big depression in 1951-1952, no one Bear Trend! Actually, if we bought on the 1st of January 1951 we would have not seen the position in loss, ever!

The forecast about the end of the downtrend in October and November 1952 is not bad, this is actually a good buy opportunity, but we don’t come from a Bear Market.

The Market did a Low in September 1953; Gann did forecast an uptrend of the Market starting from Summer… not so precise here as well.

 

The positive thing about his forecast…

… is that, forecasting a downtrend during 1951-1952 and the beginning of a new uptrend in 1953, looking at the chart we can see that the Stock Market did a sideways movement during 1951-1952, with the tendency to move a bit higher, and in 1953 a new strong uptrend started:

Do you still believe that Gann was perfect? I have studied Gann for many years, I use his work to make my studies as well, but I use them for what I have understood about him, and not what people think he was able to do. His forecast has been wrong during 1951-1952, but it is also true that the Market stopped pushing strongly up during this period, and the Stock Market restarted pushing strongly up exactly when he was forecasting the end of the downtrend. Do you see the correlation? Do you see why it is good to have the forecast, but it is also good to use a strategy if something goes wrong? We can make a lot of money when the forecast is right, for example from 1953, but we had to be careful when the Market didn’t push down during 1951-1952. I Am in Wall Street Ltd works in the same way, I know it because I do similar forecasts as Gann did (sometimes wrong)! However, the strategy makes the difference, when you make big profits with the right forecast, and take little losses with a wrong forecast.

 

Summing up

I did not write this article because I wanted to speak badly about Gann (which remains one of my main guides), I just want to make people open their eyes, helping them to not waste their money believing in fairy tales. We know what we are talking about, we know it is easy to believe that the forecast is the solution, but it is not! The forecast is very important, but the strategy is not less important if we want to trade to make profits! We don’t have to believe in any word doing this job, we are dealing with numbers, not with words, and only the numbers are the true answer to what we should be looking for!

Do you want to believe in rumors? Do you know the rumor about W. D. Gann’s son, where he says that he has never seen any money that people say William Delbert Gann made? Wake up!



3 Comments

  • Давид

    Да ты просто тупица, который вздумал критиковать Ганна. Я читал его работы и там довольно серьезная и научно обоснованная теория движения и прогнозирования цены. А ты тут кудахтаешь, что он не прав в прогнозах, пойми чудик – Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi. так что захлопни свое хлебало…

    • Daniele Prandelli

      It is hard to accept the truth, the evident one, the one proved with facts. If you want to have a conversation, I am happy with it. If you tell me to shut up, you can go away, forget me and my website. If you want to reply, first learn to write in english, thanks.

    • Daniele Prandelli

      And the fact that you use offensive words with an entry-comment wihtout even knowing me proves your degree of education; I would be happy to have a debate with you, but with these premises I have no reason and no interest at all to speak with a rude person. You lost you chance… Do not even bother to reply becuase your comments will not be approved for the simple reason that you were rude. As I said, you lost your chance…

Leave a Reply

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.